Influence of the Translucency and Thickness of Permanent 3D-Printed Resins on the Microhardness and Degree of Conversion of Resin Cements
Printing Three-Dimensional; Resin Cements; Polymerization.
Objective: To evaluate the influence of the thickness and translucency of 3D-printed permanent restorative resins on the microhardness and degree of conversion of resin cements. Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional printed resin blocks measuring 9 mm × 7 mm were fabricated with thicknesses of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm and three translucency levels (high, medium, and low) using a FlashForge Foto 6.0 (FlashForge) printer and a permanent restorative resin (Voxelprint Ceramic, FGM). Cement specimens were prepared using a custom-made mold designed to standardize the light-curing area, as well as the positioning and angulation of the printed resin blocks and cement specimens. Two resin cements were evaluated: a dual-cure resin cement (All Cem, FGM) and a light-cure resin cement (All Cem Venner, FGM) (N = 200). Specimens (3 × 3 × 1 mm) were light-cured using a Polywave Bluephase NG4 curing unit (Ivoclar) at an irradiance of 1200 mW/cm² for 40 s and allocated according to resin translucency (high, medium, and low), cement type (dual-cure and light-cure), and resin thickness (control, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm). In the control group, the resin cement was light-cured without the interposition of a 3D-printed resin block (n = 10). Vickers microhardness was measured using a microhardness tester (402 MVD, Wolpert) with a 300-g load applied for 5 s. Three indentations were performed on both the top and bottom surfaces of each cement specimen. The degree of conversion was determined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Data were analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and one-way ANOVA to compare the top and bottom surfaces. Results: Three-way ANOVA showed that, on the top surface, the DMT-0.5 (54.23 ± 1.73)A, DHT-0.5 (53.39 ± 2.18)A, and DLT-0.5 (52.40 ± 1.56)A groups exhibited the highest Vickers microhardness values. On the bottom surface, the highest microhardness values were also observed in the DMT-0.5 (54.23 ± 1.73)A, DHT-0.5 (53.39 ± 2.18)A, and DLT-0.5 (52.40 ± 1.56)A groups, whereas the lowest value was found for the FLT-2.0 group (26.70 ± 3.22)F. Conclusion: The thickness and translucency of the 3D-printed resin significantly influenced the microhardness and degree of conversion of the resin cements. Greater resin thickness and lower translucency were associated with reduced mean values of both properties.