Banca de DEFESA: RODIO LUIS BRANDAO CAMARA

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : RODIO LUIS BRANDAO CAMARA
DATA : 26/08/2019
HORA: 11:00
LOCAL: UFRN - NUCLEO DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO
TÍTULO:

TRIPLE ACCUMULATION OF PUBLIC OFFICE IN THE MILITARY: Constitutional permission and ethical questioning.

PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

Military. Triple accumulation. Paid public office. Constitutional permission. Declarative interpretation. Ethical and moral question.

PÁGINAS: 202
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
ÁREA: Direito
SUBÁREA: Direito Público
ESPECIALIDADE: Direito Constitucional
RESUMO:

In a relatively recent monograph presented as an undergraduate degree paper by UFRN, a unique hermeneutic controversy was discussed regarding the interpretation of the text modified by Constitutional Amendment No. 77 of February 12, 2014 (EC 77). It was considered that the mutated text concerning the accumulation of positions or jobs by military health professionals could be interpreted in two different ways: one of them, the restrictive interpretation, would authorize the accumulation of just one more public bond (double possibility), while the other, the declarative interpretation, would allow the accumulation of up to two more public ties, in addition to the military bond itself already exercised (triple possibility, which thus would also include the double possibility). At the conclusion of this monograph, a constitutional permission was recognized for the triple accumulation of positions to military health professionals. This conclusion was justified by a closer reading of the constitutional provisions that refer specifically to military health professionals in the Transitional Constitutional Provisions Act (ADCT) and in the text itself modified by EC 77. Thus, starting from a grammatical interpretation and logic of the constitutional text, the possibility of a permit to the triple accumulation of public office was contextualized to the social demands existing in the Unified Health System. However, in opposition to this conclusion, it was pointed out by the examining board of this work an absence of ethical and moral justification. to grant this exceptional “privilege” to a circumscribed category of public agents to the detriment of others. Such evaluative questioning was based on Kant's categorical imperative, in his variant of known as Universal Law, which states that individual action must be universalized action for all. This dissertation resumes and deepens the academic discussion about the triple accumulation of public bonds of the health professional military, considered in its possibility of support by the current Brazilian legal system when being based on the interpretation of the constitutional text that has changed from the EC 77. In addition, calling for further discussion, Constitutional Amendment No. 101 of July 3, 2019 (EC 101) authorizing the accumulation of public positions to military health professionals and teachers of the Military Police and Fire Brigades was recently promulgated. State. In the same vein, the controversial infraconstitutional obstacle of a 60-hour weekly ceiling advocated by the Federal Attorney General's Office was also recently relativized by the STF, STJ and AGU itself. All these aspects demand a new and deep approach to the subject in its hermeneutic and normative legal aspects. Finally, entering into the field of the philosophy of law, we analyze the possibility of an ethics that addresses the moral issue of the triple accumulation of positions by certain public agents, to the detriment of others. In this sense, as an alternative to imposing Kant's categorical imperative, the proposal of an ethic of consensus building based on the communicative action advocated by Jürgen Haberrnas is presented.

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Interno - 010.069.614-70 - LEONARDO OLIVEIRA FREIRE - SESED
Externo à Instituição - MARCO AURELIO DE MEDEIROS JORDÃO - UNI-RN
Presidente - 1675264 - RICARDO TINOCO DE GOES