Banca de DEFESA: HEITOR EDUARDO CABRAL BEZERRA

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : HEITOR EDUARDO CABRAL BEZERRA
DATA : 29/07/2019
HORA: 09:00
LOCAL: UFRN - NUCLEO DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO
TÍTULO:

THE RELATIONSHIP AND THE COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY CONSTITUTIONALISM, DEMOCRATIZATION OF THE JURISDICTIONAL FUNCTION AND BINDING PRECEDENTS IN BRAZILIAN JURIDICAL ORDER

PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

Liberal constitutionalism. Contemporary Constitutionalism. Jurisdictional function. Democratic Legitimacy. Binding precedents.

PÁGINAS: 209
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
ÁREA: Direito
SUBÁREA: Direito Público
ESPECIALIDADE: Direito Constitucional
RESUMO:

• Celebrated by some and criticized by others, the stare decisis system adopted by the Brazilian procedural law is, undoubtedly, one of the most important innovations of this procedural statute. Even if it is possible to affirm that the judges were already forced to follow precedents, it is undeniable that with the advent of the new statute the system was valued, expanded and improved. In view of the relevance that the theme has acquired in our procedural order, it is necessary to analyze its relationship and its compatibility with the current evolutionary stage of the Science of Law, more specifically with contemporary constitutionalism and with the actual notions of procedural democracy, which require that the jurisdictional function be exercised in a democratically legitimate manner. Only then will be possible to conclude about the necessity or the convenience of the existence of a system of binding precedents in the Brazilian legal order, traditionally affiliated to the civil law. As well known, post-positivist dictates have renewed the Science of Law. In order to understand this current context, it is necessary to do a critical and historical analysis about the process of formation of the Rule of Law, from the decline of Absolutism to the present, highlighting some of the main aspects of liberal, social and contemporary constitutionalism, its positive and negative points, which will justify the desired conclusion. Among the most relevant features of the current stage, it highlights the expansion and fortification of the Judiciary, and the hermeneutic opening provided by the understanding of the distinction between text and norm and by the understanding that all interpretive activity is also creative. In this context, is essential to study the democratic legitimacy of the jurisdictional function. The purpose here is to establish the means by the jurisdiction can be exercised in a democratic way, that the contemporary times demands. And one of the main aspects capable to democratize judicial acts, including decisions, is a procedural law that resizes some of the main corollaries of due process of law and access to justice, like the motivation, the publicity and the contradictory. In this way, a judicial process, appropriated to the premises of contemporary constitutionalism must be structured in a dialogic way that guarantee effectiveness and balance in the participation and in the distribution of rights, duties and procedural burdens among all the participants and interested in the process result. However, the system of binding precedents adopted by the Brazilian procedural statute has been criticized in cause of a possible incompatibility of its institutes and techniques with the premises of contemporary constitutionalism and with a democratically judicial process. In this context, the present study will analyze the relation between the binding precedents, the contemporary constitutionalism and the democratic principle applicable to the civil process, to conclude about the necessity or the convenience of a stare decisis system o in our juridical order.
  
  

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Presidente - 1167852 - JOSE ORLANDO RIBEIRO ROSARIO
Externo à Instituição - LEONARDO OLIVEIRA FREIRE - F.M.Nassau
Interna - 1753603 - PATRICIA BORBA VILAR GUIMARAES