Banca de DEFESA: TICIANA MARIA DELGADO NOBRE

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : TICIANA MARIA DELGADO NOBRE
DATA : 26/08/2016
HORA: 11:00
LOCAL: UFRN - NUCLEO DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO
TÍTULO:

A LEGITIMIDADE E EFETIVIDADE DA DECISÃO JUDICIAL CONCRETIZADORA DO DIREITO À SAÚDE NO BRASIL: UMA ABORDAGEM POLÍTICO-JURÍDICA DO PROBLEMA 


PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

social rights; legalization; health; dialogicity; jurisdiction.


PÁGINAS: 150
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
ÁREA: Direito
SUBÁREA: Direito Público
ESPECIALIDADE: Direito Constitucional
RESUMO:

Starting from the understanding of the emergence of fundamental rights as the result of the constant pursuit of society to establish itself before the State, this paper points out constitutionalization of social rights, particularly the social right to health, as the apogee of this historical perspective which reflected the actual need to preserve the dignity of human beings in contemporary societies. Based on that philosophical observation and the affirmation of pragmatic ineffectiveness of the full achievement of human’s fundamental social rights, it seeks to analyze the State’s institutions performances in order to assert the right to health and, particularly the exercise of judicial activity in order to give effect to the constitutional rules to achieve it. Thus, recognizing the social reality of the implementation of the right to health inserted in a constitutional ineffectiveness that reflects the gap between social issues and state interventions needed to solve them and also taking into account the open statement of the constitutional principles that, most often, lead to totally disassociated judicial interpretations of the underlying factual reality, we analyze the performance of the judiciary from the perspective of the (in)effectiveness of its decisions, considering that if the current judicial context is to predominate, a sort of constitutionalism that cannot stabilize its  normative expectations will be perpetuated. This is how, based on the constitutional foundations of solidarity and social justice, the increasing of a more dialogic action of jurisdiction is proposed, both through the exercise of its decision-making power and the exercising of the constitutional hermeneutics of its decisions from a prolific dimension, valuing the compatibilization of the normative pre-understanding with reality and social complexity, both when the jurisdiction is engaging in dialogue with the other powers and organs of the State, in order to, based on the diagnosis of the demand which is earned by legalization, to be able to articulate parameters and decision-making patterns achievable commands in objective reality, thus contributing effectively to the realization of the right to health in Brazil.

 


MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Externo à Instituição - FLÁVIA SOUSA DANTAS PINTO - ESMARN
Presidente - 1197589 - MARIA DOS REMEDIOS FONTES SILVA
Interno - 1675264 - RICARDO TINOCO DE GOES
Notícia cadastrada em: 10/08/2016 12:10
SIGAA | Superintendência de Tecnologia da Informação - (84) 3342 2210 | Copyright © 2006-2024 - UFRN - sigaa07-producao.info.ufrn.br.sigaa07-producao