Banca de DEFESA: JONE FAGNER RAFAEL MACIEL

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : JONE FAGNER RAFAEL MACIEL
DATA : 15/08/2016
HORA: 09:00
LOCAL: A REPRESENTAÇÃO JUDICIAL DE AGENTES PÚBLICOS PELA ADVOCACIA DE ESTADO NO QUADRO DE SUA CONFORMAÇÃO C
TÍTULO:

THE REPRESENTATION OF PUBLIC OFFICERS BY THE STATE ADVOCACY FROM ITS CONSTITUCIONAL CONFORMATION

PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

Constitucion. State Advocacy. Defense of public officials.

PÁGINAS: 166
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
ÁREA: Direito
SUBÁREA: Direito Público
ESPECIALIDADE: Direito Constitucional
RESUMO:

The constitutional conformation of State Advocacy analyzed in Articles 131 and 132 of Federal Constitution and, based on it, the confirmation of prospect to promote the defense of public officials are the object of study presented herein. The undertaken analysis will focus on the specification of core competencies conferred to State Advocacy, taking into account the configuration promoted by the constitutional lawmaker that granted to it the autonomy related to Republican Powers described in FC Article 2nd as it was included in a separate chapter, and the repercussions that follow this option in the event of the new Brazilian legal and constitutional order founding act. We sought to explain, considering this normative-structural conformation of State Advocacy, the linkage that intersects it with other Justice Essential Functions and with what makes it specific, in order to know the degree of autonomy that is granted to it, and the limits of its end performance based on the examination of contentious competencies (judicial and extrajudicial representation) and non-contentious (consulting and advisory services), and the legal consequences arising from the constitutional lawmaker lack of systematicity when specifically dealt with it. These bases will allow us to step into the lawmaker’s limits, be it a reformer constitutional lawmaker or an infra-constitutional one, aimed at the organizational task of State Advocacy, especially when trying to understand its competence beyond those drawn out from FC Art. 131, caput, and 132, in order to discourse about the unconstitutionality of granting public officers with judicial or extrajudicial representation, as carried out by the Federal Advocacy General's Office through Art. 22 of the 9.028/95 Act. The analysis of unconstitutionality will be based on two aspects: the personal assumption of responsibility by public officials and the provisions of the Republican Principle contained in CF Art. 1°.

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Externo à Instituição - ALEXANDRE COUTINHO PAGLIARINI - UNINTER - PR
Interno - 3204015 - FABIANO ANDRE DE SOUZA MENDONCA
Presidente - 1497348 - LEONARDO MARTINS