Banca de DEFESA: ELINE COSTA DE LIMA

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : ELINE COSTA DE LIMA
DATE: 05/02/2024
TIME: 14:00
LOCAL: Sala 51 - CCET
TITLE:

DO THEY MODIFY THE ARGUMENTS FROM THE COUNTER-ARGUMENTS? THE CASE OF THE SIMULATED JURY ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR SANITATION

KEY WORDS:

Simulated jury; Dialectical and dialogic argumentation; New Legal Framework for Basic Sanitation

PAGES: 126
BIG AREA: Outra
AREA: Divulgação Científica
SUMMARY:

The potential of argumentation for scientific education is defended by several authors of Science Didactics. From a dialogical and dialectical perspective, argumentation is a discursive activity characterized by the defense of points of view and consideration of different perspectives. The negotiation of different perspectives gives argumentation an epistemic potential, that is, knowledge construction. Debate situations are pointed out as important argumentative practices for teaching from this perspective. A didactic strategy capable of encouraging debate is the mock jury (or mock trial), a particular case of role-play game that aims to discuss a controversial topic. However, there are few works in the literature that address the relationships between the simulated jury in Science Teaching and argumentation. Taking this into consideration, this work proposes a case study on the mock jury strategy based on the dialogical and dialectical perspective of argumentation. Our general objective is to analyze the process of constructing knowledge claims based on arguments and counterarguments produced in guided simulated jury activities in a teaching context. As a controversial topic, the New Legal Framework for Basic Sanitation, Federal Law No. 14,026/2020, was chosen due to the controversies involved in its approval and implementation. To achieve the proposed objective, activities were developed and organized in the stages of preparation, implementation, and evaluation of the simulated jury, applied in five meetings in the training meetings of participants in the Pedagogical Residency Program – Chemistry Subproject of UFRN (CAAE - Certificate of Presentation of Ethical Appreciation 57847622.4.0000.5537). Data collection was done through audio recordings of the meetings, in addition to written materials produced by students in the three stages (questionnaires, guided scripts, evaluation forms, and field diary). The data was analyzed using an analytical tool based on Bakthinian elements. As a result, the potential of activities oriented towards a simulated jury in the review and reflection of perspectives stands out as important mechanisms for building knowledge, from preparation to its actual evaluation. Furthermore, the evaluative relationships established with perspectives also seem to influence the construction of knowledge, but more research is needed to better understand this relationship.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Presidente - 3321606 - MARCIA GORETTE LIMA DA SILVA
Externa à Instituição - MAYARA LARRYS GOMES DE ASSIS NOGUEIRA - UFPA
Externa à Instituição - SYLVIA REGINA DE CHIARO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES - UFPE