Banca de DEFESA: ADEILZA CLÍMACO FERREIRA

Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : ADEILZA CLÍMACO FERREIRA
DATE: 19/11/2021
TIME: 09:30
LOCAL: Plataforma google meet
TITLE:

SOCIAL SERVICE IN THE SOCIO-LEGAL AREA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CONSERVATIVE REQUIREMENTS THAT PERSIDE THE DEBATE ABOUT THE SPECIAL STATEMENT

KEY WORDS:

Social Work; Special Testimony; Conservatism.

PAGES: 210
BIG AREA: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
AREA: Serviço Social
SUBÁREA: Serviço Social Aplicado
SPECIALTY: Serviço Social do Menor
SUMMARY:

The Special Testimony is a technique of judicial listening aimed at cases of violence against children and youth that has gained relevance in Brazil and worldwide, with the participation of social workers for its execution. In view of this, this doctoral thesis has as a general objective to analyze the conservative requests that permeate the role of the Social Service together with the Special Testimony. In order to reach the general objective, we have outlined the following specific objectives: to analyze the conservative perspectives present in protection policies aimed at children and adolescents who are victims of violence in Brazil; analyze the repercussions of the social, political and instrumental dimensions that permeate the Special Testimony for the ethical-political project of Social Work; analyze the fight strategies of the CFESS/CRESS group in facing the judicial listening processes. We start from a qualitative approach anchored in a theoretical and methodological perspective based on historical and dialectical materialism. As a research technique, we resorted to bibliographical and documental research and analysis. Our bibliographical research included the study of critical authors who develop their reflections within this theme and in the documentary, therefore, we carried out the study of laws, decrees, resolutions, reports, technical opinions and news from the courts of justice. The interpretation of our research data showed us that the Special Testimony is a conservative requirement for Social Work, since the role of interviewer proposed for the implementation of the methodology is not anchored in the list of professional attributions and competences. Our analyzes also revealed a tendency to return to the overvaluation of technicality resulting from the prevalence of the use of protocols in the search for material truth, to the detriment of the analysis of the totality based on social studies of the phenomenon of violence. We identified that even in the face of the struggle and resistance strategies of the CFESS/CRESS group in defense of the ethical-political project and professional autonomy, the Brazilian judiciary has legitimized in the country a notion of positivist and conservative law based on criminal liability. The data also revealed that the tension caused by the CFESS/CRESS set has assumed a significant role in the defense of the Rights Guarantee System and, consequently, of full protection. Our analyzes point to an institutional attempt by the courts of justice to secondary and subjugate professional knowledge, turning Social Work into an appendix in the solution of the needs of conservative justice, even going backwards in terms of the meaning of law.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Presidente - 1451156 - CARLA MONTEFUSCO DE OLIVEIRA
Interna - 414.166.784-68 - MARIA DALVA HORACIO DA COSTA - UFRN
Interna - 307.164.894-49 - RITA DE LOURDES DE LIMA - UFRN
Externa ao Programa - 1694568 - DANIELA NEVES DE SOUSA
Externa à Instituição - IZAURA RODRIGUES NASCIMENTO - UEA
Externo à Instituição - LUCILENE FERREIRA DE MELO - UFAM