SPECIAL TESTIMONY: CONSERVATIVE TRENDS OF POLICIES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH AND THE IMPACTS TO SOCIAL SERVICE'S DEMANDS
Social Work; Special Testimony; State; Violence; Conservatism
This thesis project aims to analyze the conservative tendencies of policies for childhood and youth and the rebounds to the demands placed on Social Work professionals who work in the Special Statement. With the purpose of this research we will seek to investigate how these trends affect professional demands, especially when we consider that the Special Statement is a technique that seeks to inquire children and adolescents victims or witnesses of violence and have had the participation of social workers acting as interpreter. consequently contributing to the production and materiality of the expert evidence. For such, as specific objectives, we have: to analyze the conservative perspectives present in the protection policies directed to the children and adolescents victims of sexual violence in Brazil; analyze the rebounds of the ethical-political, theoretical-methodological and technical-operative trends that permeate the Special Statement, as a public policy, for social service and analyze the strategies of struggle of the CFESS / CRESS set in facing judicial inquiry processes. The theoretical and methodological course will be based on historical and dialectical materialism and will be delineated through the qualitative approach. As research techniques, we will use the bibliographical, documentary and empirical research in order to unveil the real from successive approaches. The field research, in turn, will include an interview with a Social Work professional, a judge who operates the methodology and a representative of the CFESS / CRESS suite. We assume that the State, through the judiciary, establishes as a public policy a technique for gathering evidence that overshadows the criminal responsibility of the defendant over the full protection of the victimized subjects and that the performance of Social Work professionals as interpreter of the judge. it violates the legal precepts historically defended by the professional category.