Banca de DEFESA: MAÍSA DE OLIVEIRA MEIRA

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : MAÍSA DE OLIVEIRA MEIRA
DATE: 11/02/2021
TIME: 09:30
LOCAL: Videoconferência
TITLE:

THE DECISION EXPERIENCE IN FEDERAL JUDGES: BEYOND THE AUTHORS

KEY WORDS:

Phenomenological Psychology; Hermeneutic Phenomenology; Phenomenological Research; Magistrate; Law;

PAGES: 132
BIG AREA: Ciências Humanas
AREA: Psicologia
SUMMARY:

This research aimed to understand the experience of the decision of the federal judge of first instance from the narrative of those who exercise the magistracy. The proposal of listening to the judges was presented as another possibility of approximation between Psychology, Law and the Judiciary, unlike the traditional relationship based on expert opinions that was established between these fields of knowledge. The three collaborators, two judges and a judge, were selected from among the magistrates of the Judiciary Section of the Federal Justice in Rio Grande do Norte and who served in the judiciary in the City of Natal. This study was configured as a qualitative research with a phenomenological hermeneutical inspiration, based on the ontology of the philosopher Martin Heidegger. The instrument of access to what the research collaborator experienced was the narrative interview. The comprehension and interpretation of the researched phenomenon took place from Heidegger's understanding circle. The moments of understanding the narratives were: affected by the testimony heard; transcription of the testimony heard; identification of themes; dialogue between the reflections made from the previous steps and the literature. When asking federal judges: "What is the decision process like for you in your work activity?" The question elicited answers due to the human condition of existence, they announced how each judge felt at stake as one existing in the exercise of the judiciary. And that in a sentence there is also anguish, existential vulnerability, life and death, the look of peers, in addition to the social repercussion of their sentences. The speeches were related to the meanings rooted in the world, they speak of the horizon of belonging of the judges, they referred to the ways of relations and articulation of the judge with what arrived in the world. In the encounter with the other, the judge met with the drama that also belongs to him, which is to be his own question.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Externa à Instituição - ANA ANDREA BARBOSA MAUX - UNIFACEX
Presidente - 1879584 - ANA KARINA SILVA AZEVEDO
Externa ao Programa - 6350812 - SYMONE FERNANDES DE MELO