RIGHT TO HEALTH: socioeconomic impacts of reducing bureaucracy in incorporation and provision of exceptional medicines by the SUS.
Right to health. SUS. Exceptional Medicines. Debureaucratization. Efficiency.
In Brazil, especially with regard to the constitutional provision of the right to health, difficulties and obstacles have been observed in providing pharmaceutical care to the population, especially for people belonging to more vulnerable groups. In this sense, Public Administration, especially in terms of managing public health policies, needs reformulations and innovations that provide a more efficient and effective management in guaranteeing the rights of the population. The public policies of incorporation and supply of exceptional medicines are relevant for Brazil, because of this, the present work aims, through the evaluation of social, economic data and data of the judicialization of medicines in the Unified Health System (SUS), to analyze impasses generated by the disagreement between the Powers on socioeconomic public policies and the adequate supply of high-cost medicines by the SUS in view of the right to health and the financial resources available by the State, as well as the reduction of bureaucracy in the incorporation and supply of exceptional medicines in the SUS . In this regard, the present study points out some of the constitutional and legislative provisions on the theme of the right to health and public policies for pharmaceutical care of the specialized component, and exposes "difficulties" around the constitutional protection of health, the interpretative activity of norms by the public management and by the Judiciary and the strategies used by Brazil for the social and economic development of the country.