THE HABITATION RIGHT EFFECTIVENESS BY THE SOCIAL RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE
Social Rights. Right to Habitation. Justice. Equality Material. Minimum Existential. Rights of Provision. Judicialism. Judicial Activism. Limits.
This dissertation intends to analyze the fundamental right to habitation, as a social right, theyer effectiveness, and the public habitation policies problems. To do so, it analyzes the issues of the judicialization of social rights and the judicialactivism, as ways of the omissions and failures of the Executive and Legislative Powers to realize these rights. It starts, therefore, from qualitative research, making considerations about the institutionalization of the right to habitation as a social right and the peculiarities of these rights. Because the fundamental right to habitation demands positive benefits from the State for its concrete realization. Besides the fact that the right to habitation is a fundamental component of the conception of existential minimum to a dignified life, being presupposed of the principle of the dignity of the human person, established within the conception of justice through material equality. It also includes the new constitutional order established by neoconstitutionalism, which extended access to justice and the power of the judiciary, assuming the role of Guardian of the Constitution. These facts lead to the conclusion that judicialization and judicial activism end up being mechanisms for the right to habitation to be questioned. But these are not unlimited actions of the Judiciary, which find their limits exactly in the constitutional order and in the idea of the necessary preservation of the existential minimum.