.
Language. Language Games. Ethic. Subject.
Considering the content of Wittgensten's philosophy, we commonly see the Tractatus Logico Philosophicus and the Philosophical Investigations as two supposedly antagonistic works, and this leads us to question how it is possible that an author like Wittgenstein can discuss relevant themes in these works, such as language and its meaning, and has built two completely different phases of thought. From this perspective, we intend to investigate the possibility of continuity in Wittgensten's thought, emphasizing the ethical content worked initially in the Tractatus and then found or resumed in the Investigations. We will start this analysis starting from some arguments contained in the Introduction of Investigations, observing if there is a more precise relationship between these two works and with that we will reflect on ethics following the Austrian philosopher's line of reasoning. With this approach, we aim to understand whether the discourse about ethics can be sustained in the two phases of this author. We ratify that although it seems understandable to us to understand that the concepts pointed out by the author may vary from one work to another, this does not imply that the themes raised are completely different, which brings up the need to clarify these concepts, observing at what point they can explain the discourse on ethics.